Imam Khamenei’s Strategy for the Advent of Imam Mahdi (Peace Be Upon Him): A Blueprint for Social Reconstruction and Future-Building
The concept of “waiting for the advent” (of Imam Mahdi) has always been one of the most fundamental elements of the religious and historical identity of Shia Muslims. However, in contemporary times, this concept has moved beyond a merely individual or ritualistic belief and has become an influential issue in social, cultural, political, and civilizational spheres. Among these interpretations, Imam Khamenei’s strategy for the advent, combined with his understanding of Mahdism and expectation, is one of the most important and coherent contemporary readings of this religious doctrine. It is an interpretation that connects religious faith with social responsibility, historical future-building, and the creation of an Islamic civilization.
Within this framework, Imam Khamenei’s strategy for the advent interprets expectation as an active, hope-inspiring, and responsibility-generating concept. This concept moves people from “passive wishing” to “responsible action” on the path to achieving the desired Islamic future. In this view, expectation is not limited to praying for the advent, but also involves striving for individual and societal reform, spreading justice, strengthening spirituality, scientific advancement, maintaining independence, and confronting domination and injustice.
According to Imam Khamenei’s strategy for the advent, a waiting society must establish the foundations of a New Islamic civilization, relying on self-belief, the pursuit of justice, and the governance of Islamic values. This civilization must be able to offer a model based on spirituality, dignity, and justice in the face of contemporary global moral, identity, and spiritual crises. For this reason, concepts such as scientific jihad, anti-arrogance, resistance, comprehensive development, and the unity of the global Muslim community (Ummah) are not merely political slogans in his thought; rather, they are considered part of the process of preparing the Muslim community for the fulfillment of God’s ultimate promise.
This article aims to analytically examine the main components of Imam Khamenei’s strategy for paving the way for the advent (of Imam Mahdi), and to show how the concept of expectation, within this intellectual framework, transforms into a model for personal transformation, social reconstruction, and civilizational future-making.
Expectation: From Historical Passivity to Civilizational Activism
One of the most important features of Imam Khamenei’s interpretation of Mahdism is his move away from a passive understanding of expectation. Historically, expectation was often interpreted simply as enduring the hardships of the era of the Occultation, maintaining personal faith, and avoiding the corruption of the times. In such a view, the individual’s role in social and historical changes was not very prominent, and a better future was largely seen as something that would happen regardless of the active participation of human society. Morteza Mutahhari, in his analysis, distinguished between “constructive expectation” and “destructive expectation,” arguing that true expectation acts as a catalyst for social movement and reform (46-47). However, in Imam Khamenei’s thought, expectation is a concept that “creates movement” and “builds responsibility.” He states that expectation is movement and preparation, not stagnation (Khamenei, “Leader’s Speech”).
Based on this perspective, a society that is waiting for Imam Mahdi (Peace be upon him) cannot be indifferent to injustice, backwardness, dependency, or corruption because true expectation requires striving to move closer to the ideal Mahdavi society. As a result, expectation shifts from a merely mental or emotional state into a “historical project” to build the future. This transformation represents a core principle of Imam Khamenei’s strategy for the advent.
This conceptual shift has significant implications for social thought. From the perspective of the sociology of religion, this can be compared to Max Weber’s view on how religious beliefs direct social action—where religious convictions can transform into a force for social and historical change (270). First, it turns hope into an active element of social life. Second, it increases human responsibility for the fate of society. Third, it creates a bond between religious devotion and social progress. In this framework, expectation is not defined as an escape from the world, but as an effort to reform it.
The Sovereignty of the Quran and Islam: The Bedrock of the Expectant Society
In Imam Khamenei’s intellectual system, the realization of the sovereignty of Islamic values is one of the most important prerequisites for forming an expectant society. From his perspective, a society not organized on the basis of justice, spirituality, and divine laws lacks the capacity to accept a global government of justice. He states that those who are waiting for Imam Mahdi (Peace be upon him) must build and structure their lives today to align with the values upon which the government of Imam Mahdi (Peace be upon him) will be formed (Khamenei, “Leader’s Speech”). In this view, the sovereignty of Islam is not limited to performing individual rituals; it means the presence of Quranic values in all areas of social life—from economic justice and supporting the deprived to cultural health, political independence, and human dignity.
An analysis of this approach shows that Imam Khamenei links the issue of expectation to “social system-building.” In other words, a society that is waiting must also move toward the realization of divine values within its economic, cultural, and political structures. For this reason, social justice, fighting corruption, supporting the oppressed, and strengthening public morality are not merely administrative policies; they are considered part of the process of preparing for the advent. Ayatollah Ibrahim Amini, in his works on Mahdism, also introduces the spread of justice and the moral readiness of society as the most important characteristics of a waiting society (260-63).
Historical Hope and Maintaining the Spirit of Expectation
One of the key elements in Imam Khamenei’s thought is transforming expectation into a source of social and historical hope. From his perspective, believing in the advent of Imam Mahdi prevents despair and a feeling of dead-end in the face of global crises. He states, “Those who believe in the advent of Imam Mahdi (May our souls be sacrificed for him) never fall into hopelessness and despair” (Khamenei, “The Leader’s Remarks”).
According to this vision, expectation is not merely an End-Times belief; rather, it is a hopeful outlook on the future of history. This perspective prevents society from surrendering to the current situation and empowers it to resist pressures and crises.
A sociological analysis of this viewpoint shows that hope, in this perspective, is not just a psychological feeling but a social asset for the continued historical movement of Islamic society. A society that is hopeful about the future will have greater ability to overcome crises, maintain cohesion, and sustain collective effort. We can see a practical example of this in the widespread participation of youth in voluntary, jihad-based activities that are based on a sense of responsibility, hope, and involvement in building the future.
Self-development and Social Reform: The Condition for an Ideal Society
In Imam Khamenei’s thought, reforming the society is impossible without reforming the individual. He believes that many social problems stem from moral, cultural, and behavioral weaknesses. He states, “We need to work on self-development, and we need to bring about transformations as much as our skills and capabilities allow” (Khamenei “Awaiting the Reappearance”).
In this framework, expectation is linked to self-development. A waiting society is one where responsibility, ethics, simple living, strengthening family foundations, and avoiding excessive consumerism are emphasized.
From an analytical perspective, this view shows that Imam Khamenei does not limit the issue of the advent solely to political or structural changes; he also connects it to changes in lifestyle and public culture. For this reason, issues such as family strength, confronting extravagance, and strengthening cultural identity gain civilizational importance within this framework. This marks an important difference from some purely political approaches, as here, social change begins within the individual and then spreads to broader areas of society.
Scientific Progress and Knowledge-Based Jihad: The Strength of a Society in Waiting
One of the prominent aspects of Imam Khamenei’s thought is the connection between expectation and scientific progress. Unlike some traditional interpretations that separated End-Times matters from scientific development, in his view, a waiting society must be a pioneering, capable society with the power to produce knowledge. Therefore, paying attention to research, innovation, training skilled personnel, and strengthening scientific infrastructure is considered part of the preparation process for the desired future.
An analysis of this viewpoint shows that Imam Khamenei considers “scientific power” essential for maintaining the independence and dignity of Islamic society. As he explicitly states: “If a country wishes dignity, sovereignty, independence, identity, security, and welfare, it must be able scientifically” (Khamenei, “Iranians Deserve”).
A society that is scientifically and technologically dependent will also become dependent in its political and economic decisions. For this reason, the emphasis on knowledge-based companies, new technologies, national production, and supporting elites are not merely economic policies; rather, they are part of the broader strategy to strengthen the civilizational power of Islamic society and thus pave the way for the advent of Imam Mahdi (Peace be upon him).
Resistance and Anti-Arrogance: Preserving the Independence of Islamic Society
In Imam Khamenei’s intellectual system, expectation is directly linked to the spirit of resistance and refusing domination. He believes that a waiting society must not become defeated or passive in the face of dominant powers. He states, “If a nation submits to the domination of the world’s great powers, it is lost” (Khamenei, “Meeting”). In this view, resistance is not merely a political tactic; it is an issue related to human dignity and the historical identity of nations. A society that loses its independence will gradually suffer from cultural erosion and a weakening of collective self-confidence.
An analysis of this approach shows that Imam Khamenei links Mahdism with the issue of “collective dignity.” From his perspective, a waiting society must be able to pursue its path of progress based on internal capabilities, public trust, and self-belief. In this context, supporting oppressed nations, opposing the occupation of other nations, and defending the right of nations to self-determination are all considered part of this civilizational view of resistance.
The New Islamic Civilization: The Ultimate Horizon of the Expectation Strategy
The most important feature of Imam Khamenei’s thought on Mahdism is its connection to the idea of “civilization-building.” In this view, expectation is not merely limited to reforming individuals or society, but rather looks toward a historical future for the Islamic world. In the Second Phase of the Revolution statement, he says: “The decades ahead are your decades, and it is you who… move it closer to its great ideal: that is, the emergence of a new Islamic civilization and the preparation for the rising of the great sun of wilayah” (Khamenei, “The Second Phase”). Thus, the very process of building this civilization is the most fundamental way of paving the way for the advent.
Within Imam Khamenei’s strategy for the advent, the formation of a New Islamic Civilization represents the long‑term historical horizon of expectation. In this context, the New Islamic Civilization is an effort to present a different model of human life where material progress is accompanied by justice, spirituality, and human dignity, just as we will witness in the golden era of the rule of the righteous during the advent. An analysis of this viewpoint shows that Imam Khamenei does not consider the main crisis of the contemporary world to be merely economic or political, but rather an identity and spiritual crisis. This issue significantly aligns with Seyyed Hossein Nasr’s analyses on the crisis of spirituality in the modern world and the dominance of a materialistic outlook over contemporary human life (Nasr 107).
For this reason, Islamic society must be able to present a different image of the relationship between humanity, ethics, spirituality, and social life. Consequently, in this view, the issue of expectation transforms into a kind of civilizational project aimed at reconstructing the cultural and spiritual identity of contemporary humanity. Eric Voegelin also, in his analysis of the crises of modernity, emphasizes the necessity of returning meaning and the sacred to the sphere of social life—an issue comparable to the civilizational horizon presented in this approach (110-13).
Unity of the Global Muslim Community: A Condition for Civilizational Power
From Imam Khamenei’s perspective, the Muslim community will not be able to play its historical role without solidarity and cohesion. He argues that sectarian, ethnic, and political divisions weaken the collective strength of Muslims and hinder their progress (Khamenei “Unity”). Within this framework, Islamic unity is not merely a temporary political alliance, but an effort to revive the historical, cultural, and civilizational ties of Muslims.
An analysis of this issue shows that, in his thought, the Ummah can only be effective in global developments when it moves beyond exhausting conflicts and focuses on its commonalities. Holding the Islamic Unity Conference, emphasizing inter-faith dialogue, and supporting the Palestinian issue can be analyzed within the framework of this very strategy. In this view, Palestine is considered a symbol of a common issue for the Islamic world and a focal point for the unity of the Ummah.
Criticisms and Opposing Views: Is Expectation Political, Spiritual, or Both?
Despite the theoretical coherence of this approach, Imam Khamenei’s interpretation of expectation has also faced criticism. Some critics believe that the extensive link between Mahdism and politics might diminish the individual, ethical, and spiritual dimensions of expectation. From their perspective, in part of the historical Shia tradition, expectation has been more about maintaining faith and moral vigilance during the era of occultation. As Jean-Pierre Filiu notes, some Shiite authorities traditionally sought to “neutralize Messianism before it becomes politically subversive,” emphasizing spiritual preparation over political mobilization (26-38).
Other critics argue that if civilizational and social ideals are pursued without considering a society’s actual capacities, the widening gap between ideals and reality can lead to social fatigue and diminished public trust. Highlighting the dangers of this approach, Samuel Huntington warns that “civilizational projects, if unable to manage cultural and social tensions, may lead to deep identity rifts and widespread cultural conflicts” (20, 27-28, 252).
Applying this broader critique specifically to Shiite eschatology, some researchers warn that an over-politicization of Mahdism might not only provoke such societal tensions but also severely limit the diversity of religious interpretations. A clear historical precedent for this concern can be traced to the early years of the Islamic Revolution. While the Hojjatiyeh Society advocated a passive approach—believing that only the Mahdi himself could establish the just Islamic government—Imam Khomeini rejected this interpretation. He criticized their belief that Muslims should “wait” idly, warning against those who “say: ‘Let sin increase so that Imam Mahdi (As) will come’” and emphasizing that such passive interpretations were an “aberration” that had to be set aside (Khomeini 21: 12-13).
Proponents of Imam Khamenei’s approach also believe that separating expectation from social issues turns it into a merely individual and ineffective concept in the lives of Muslims. From their perspective, expectation can play a role in the contemporary world only if, in addition to maintaining its spiritual dimension, it can also be effective in creating hope, responsibility, and social movement.
The reality is that the first two viewpoints represent a part of the truth. If expectation becomes entirely political, there is a risk of losing its spiritual depth; if it is considered merely individual and devotional, it will lose its social and civilizational potential. Therefore, maintaining a balance between the social and spiritual dimensions of expectation is one of the most important theoretical challenges in this field.
Conclusion: Expectation as a Model for the Historical Transformation of Islamic Society
Imam Khamenei’s interpretation of expectation is an attempt to redefine the relationship of Mahdism with the social and historical life of contemporary humanity. In this view, expectation is not merely an individual and ritualistic experience, but rather a project for building the future and preparing for civilization. The main components of Imam Khamenei’s strategy for the advent can therefore be summarized as follows:
-Moral and spiritual self-refinement of individuals
-Cultural and social reform of society
-The rule of Islamic values and justice-centeredness
-Scientific progress and strengthening internal power
-Preserving independence and resistance against domination
-Strengthening the unity of the global Muslim community
-Moving toward a New Islamic Civilization
As a result, expectation transcends a purely emotional and individual concept and becomes a model for the historical transformation of Islamic society. This model strives to connect spirituality, justice, progress, and civilizational future-making. Despite criticisms and disagreements, this reading has succeeded in transforming the issue of Mahdism into one of the influential topics in contemporary social and civilizational thought, offering an active, hopeful, and responsibility-oriented vision for the future of the Islamic world. All these efforts are ultimately aimed at paving the way for the advent of Imam Mahdi (Peace be upon him) and realizing the golden age of the rule of the righteous.
Works Cited
Amini, Ibrahim. Al-Imam al-Mahdi: The Just Leader of Humanity. Translated by Abdulaziz Sachedina, Ansariyan Publications, 1997.
Filiu, Jean-Pierre. “The Return of Political Mahdism.” Current Trends in Islamist Ideology, vol. 8, 2009, pp. 26-38.
Huntington, Samuel P. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Simon & Schuster, 1996. MSU Web, msuweb.montclair.edu/~lebelp/1993SamuelPHuntingtonTheClashOfCivilizationsAndTheRemakingofWorldOrder.pdf.
Khamenei, Ali. “Awaiting the Reappearance of Imam Mahdi.” KHAMENEI.IR, 9 Apr. 2020, english.khamenei.ir/print/10341/Awaiting-the-reappearance-of-Imam-Mahdi-pbuh-must-be-accompanied. Accessed 31 May 2026.
— “Iranians Deserve to Ascend Science.” Leader.ir, www.leader.ir/en/content/3632/Iranians-deserve-to-ascend-science.
— “Leader’s Speech on the Occasion of Imam Mahdi’s Birth Anniversary.” KHAMENEI.IR, 17 Aug. 2008, english.khamenei.ir/news/867/Leader-s-Speech-on-the-Occasion-of-Imam-Mahdi-s-Birth-Anniversary. Accessed 31 May 2026.
— “Meeting with the Members of the Assembly of Experts.” 16 July 1990, Tehran. Speech.
— “The Leader’s Remarks in Graduation Ceremony of Imam Hossein University’s Cadets.” Leader.ir, 14 May 2014, www.leader.ir/en/speech/18190. Accessed 2 June 2026.
— “The Second Phase of the Revolution Statement Addressed to the Iranian Nation.” KHAMENEI.IR, 12 Feb. 2019, english.khamenei.ir/news/6415/The-Second-Phase-of-the-Revolution-Statement-addressed-to-the.
— “Unity Is the Most Important Issue in the Islamic World.” KHAMENEI.IR, 19 Jan. 2014, english.khamenei.ir/news/2046/Unity-is-the-most-important-issue-in-the-Islamic-world. Accessed 2 June 2026.
Khomeini, Ruhollah. Sahifeh-ye Imam: An Anthology of Imam Khomeini’s Speeches, Messages, Interviews, and Decrees. Vol. 21, Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works, 2012.
Mutahhari, Morteza. The Awaited Saviour. Translated by Islamic Seminary Publications, Ahlul Bayt Digital Islamic Library Project, 2023.
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. Traditional Islam in the Modern World. Kegan Paul International, 1987. TraditionalHikma.com, traditionalhikma.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Nasr-Seyyed-Hossein-Traditional-Islam-in-the-Modern-World-1987.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2026.
Voegelin, Eric. The New Science of Politics: An Introduction. University of Chicago Press, 1987. Moodle UFSC, presencial.moodle.ufsc.br/pluginfile.php/1649459/mod_resource/content/0/The New Science of Politics (Eric Voegelin) (Z-Library).pdf. Accessed 2 June 2026.
Weber, Max. The Sociology of Religion. Translated by Ephraim Fischoff, Beacon Press, 1963.
